Blockers and Approvers: Rates of Delegation and Approval for Planning Applications

Published On: 10th September 2025

The Government recently published Planning Statistics for the year to March 2025. For the 32 London boroughs, the statistics showed some interesting features.

First, they showed that all but three boroughs – Camden, Ealing and Harrow delegated decisions to officers on 90% or more of the applications they received; and that 19 of them delegated decisions on more than 98% of applications. Two boroughs – Enfield and Redbridge – delegated decisions on nearly 100% of applications.

Second, rates of approval varied much more widely, from an outlier of 64% in Hounslow, to 98% in neighbouring Hammersmith and Fulham. Rates of approval can vary for many different reasons, of course, good and bad. They depend crucially on the nature and the numbers of applications each borough receives and on the widely-varying characteristics of each local area. But it is worth noting that 26 of the 32 boroughs showed rates between 70% and 89%, and five boroughs showed rates of over 90%.

But perhaps the most notable finding is that there is no correlation at all between boroughs with high rates of delegation, and their rates of approval; or indeed vice versa. Hounslow, with by far the lowest rate of approvals, delegated 99% of its decisions to officers. Southwark, on the other hand, with the fourth lowest delegation rate at 90%, had the fourth highest rate of approval at 92%.

The Government proposes – under the wholly false heading of a ‘national scheme of delegation’ – to ban local planning committees from considering all ‘minor’ applications, even in conservation areas. This is clearly based on the assumption that planning committees block too many applications. The statistics clearly show, however, that such an assumption is simply wrong. The evidence shows that Southwark’s Planning Committee, working with its officers, achieved the fourth highest approval rate in London; whereas in Hounslow, it is the officers who must bear the responsibility, rightly or wrongly, for blocking over a third of all the applications that are submitted to them.

The relevant statistics are in the table below

Borough  % delegated % approved
Harrow                                                        81 77
Camden                                          88 88
Ealing                                                          89 89
Southwark                                            90 92
Islington                                                     93 92
Kensington and Chelsea                  93 94
Greenwich                                                 94 77
Barking and Dagenham               95 78
City of London                                     95 93
Sutton                                                           96 86
Tower Hamlets                                         97 77
Hillingdon                              97 80
Lewisham                                            97 87
Bromley                                                     98 70
Waltham Forest                                       98 72
Newham                                                    98 73
Barnet                                                          98 79
Lambeth                                                 98 82
Westminster                                           98 88
Wandsworth                                            98 89
Hounslow                                          99 64
Kingston-upon-Thames 99 72
Croydon                                                  99 74
Havering                                                    99 74
Richmond-upon-Thames                  99 77
Hackney                                          99 79
Brent                                                         99 80
Merton                                               99 84
Haringey                                                  99 86
Hammersmith and Fulham                   99 98
Redbridge                                                100 76
Enfield                                                       100 80
Share This Article

All Tags

High quality Social Housing
The Policy Exchange has a 35-Point Blueprint for a New Generation of Superlative British Social Housing. It calls for a …

Access to Green Space
CPRE (London) will run a live-stream event on Thursday 25th September 2025 on Inequality in Access to Green Space in …

Economic growth

Economic growth
The Resolution Foundation claims that growth would make all the Government’s challenges easier to solve – but it is not straining …

/ Central Government, Updates
  • Annual General Meeting 2025

    📆 Thu 16th October | 18:30 - 20:30
    🚩 77 Cowcross Street, EC1M 6EL (map)
    Doors open at 6.00PM with drinks and nibbles available ahead of the formal meeting start at 6.30PM. This will be a meeting in two parts, first the formal business of the AGM, agenda below, followed by two presentations, from our Patron Professor Tony Travers and Leanne Tritton, Chair of the London Society. The presentations will be followed by questions and discussion. Please book your place(s) using the booking facility ( https://www.londonforum.org.uk/events/agm-2025/?occurrence=2025-10-16 ). Please note that according to…

Featured Pages