Blockers and Approvers: Rates of Delegation and Approval for Planning Applications
The Government recently published Planning Statistics for the year to March 2025. For the 32 London boroughs, the statistics showed some interesting features.
First, they showed that all but three boroughs – Camden, Ealing and Harrow delegated decisions to officers on 90% or more of the applications they received; and that 19 of them delegated decisions on more than 98% of applications. Two boroughs – Enfield and Redbridge – delegated decisions on nearly 100% of applications.
Second, rates of approval varied much more widely, from an outlier of 64% in Hounslow, to 98% in neighbouring Hammersmith and Fulham. Rates of approval can vary for many different reasons, of course, good and bad. They depend crucially on the nature and the numbers of applications each borough receives and on the widely-varying characteristics of each local area. But it is worth noting that 26 of the 32 boroughs showed rates between 70% and 89%, and five boroughs showed rates of over 90%.
But perhaps the most notable finding is that there is no correlation at all between boroughs with high rates of delegation, and their rates of approval; or indeed vice versa. Hounslow, with by far the lowest rate of approvals, delegated 99% of its decisions to officers. Southwark, on the other hand, with the fourth lowest delegation rate at 90%, had the fourth highest rate of approval at 92%.
The Government proposes – under the wholly false heading of a ‘national scheme of delegation’ – to ban local planning committees from considering all ‘minor’ applications, even in conservation areas. This is clearly based on the assumption that planning committees block too many applications. The statistics clearly show, however, that such an assumption is simply wrong. The evidence shows that Southwark’s Planning Committee, working with its officers, achieved the fourth highest approval rate in London; whereas in Hounslow, it is the officers who must bear the responsibility, rightly or wrongly, for blocking over a third of all the applications that are submitted to them.
The relevant statistics are in the table below
| Borough | % delegated | % approved |
| Harrow | 81 | 77 |
| Camden | 88 | 88 |
| Ealing | 89 | 89 |
| Southwark | 90 | 92 |
| Islington | 93 | 92 |
| Kensington and Chelsea | 93 | 94 |
| Greenwich | 94 | 77 |
| Barking and Dagenham | 95 | 78 |
| City of London | 95 | 93 |
| Sutton | 96 | 86 |
| Tower Hamlets | 97 | 77 |
| Hillingdon | 97 | 80 |
| Lewisham | 97 | 87 |
| Bromley | 98 | 70 |
| Waltham Forest | 98 | 72 |
| Newham | 98 | 73 |
| Barnet | 98 | 79 |
| Lambeth | 98 | 82 |
| Westminster | 98 | 88 |
| Wandsworth | 98 | 89 |
| Hounslow | 99 | 64 |
| Kingston-upon-Thames | 99 | 72 |
| Croydon | 99 | 74 |
| Havering | 99 | 74 |
| Richmond-upon-Thames | 99 | 77 |
| Hackney | 99 | 79 |
| Brent | 99 | 80 |
| Merton | 99 | 84 |
| Haringey | 99 | 86 |
| Hammersmith and Fulham | 99 | 98 |
| Redbridge | 100 | 76 |
| Enfield | 100 | 80 |
All Tags
High Value Council Tax Surcharge
Crystal Palace National Sports Centre Redevelopment
Building the Homes London needs
Planning for Telecoms Masts
Most of us now carry smart phones around with us all the time: they have become an essential part of modern life. For most of the time when we are out and [more…]
-
Planning, Environment and Transport committee meeting
📅 Thu 11th June | 14:00 - 16:00
🚩 Room B1 70 Cowcross St, EC1M 6EJ (map)
-
How Effective is Planning Enforcement?
📆 Mon 29th June | 18:30 - 20:30
🚩 77 Cowcross Street, EC1M 6EL (map)
How can we make it work better? Planning enforcement is important. Unless it’s done effectively, the integrity of the whole planning system is put at risk. But it’s one of the most frustrating issues for civic societies and local community groups. We’ll discuss this and related issues at this Open Meeting on 29th June. Please book here ( https://www.londonforum.org.uk/events/how-effective-is-planning-enforcement#booking ) Cases typically include: Large developments that grossly fail to meet planning conditions or even submitted drawings and plans; Illegal demolitions; Unauthorised residential alterations and extensions; Additional floors…







