Statutory Consultees

Published On: 13th January 2026

Statutory consultees play an important role in the planning application process by providing expert advice on significant environmental, transport, safety, and heritage issues.  There are currently 13 organisations that local planning authorities (LPAs) must consult about specialist issues when they receive relevant planning applications, from the Environment Agency and National Highways to Historic England.

Their role is very important, but there is widespread agreement that the system is not working well, causing needless duplication of effort and delays in making decisions. Hence the Government issued in November a consultation document about ways to make the system more efficient and effective. One of the key aims is to reduce the amount of statutory consultation and follow up requests that are required, and it is difficult to argue against the proposition that there are currently too many needless referrals to the consultees.

The most eye-catching proposal is to remove Sport England, the Gardens Trust, and the Theatres Trust from the list of consultees, mitigated by requirements to notify these bodies of a subset of cases which have the highest impacts. Other measures seek to reduce the number of needless referrals and to improve levels of engagement between LPAs, developers, and the statutory consultees. Perhaps most important, statutory consultees will gain extra funding through planning fees and an ability to provide pre-application advice on a cost-recovery basis. Whether this will make more than a small dent in the funding that the consultees have lost since 2010 is far from certain.

Various other measures are proposed, and many of them seem reasonable. But our response to the consultation, available in our What we’ve said archive, makes clear that we have reservations about some of them. It remains to be seen, for instance, how well changes to the requirement for LPAs to notify statutory consultees of certain kinds of applications will work, with a particular worry about removing the requirement to notify Historic England of works on Grade 2 listed buildings (works on Grade 2* and Grade I buildings will retain that requirement).

Our main concern, however, is that the proposals do not do nearly enough to address the root cause of the problems with the statutory consultation system at present: the radical reductions in funding over the last decade and a half that have left both LPAs and statutory consultees such as the Environment Agency and Natural England without the necessary resources to make the system work as effectively as it should.

Michael Jubb, Chair

Share This Article

All Tags

E-petitions to Parliament
How to petition Parliament
There has been a relaunch of Parliament's e-petitions website, with a refreshed design and improved functionality to make it easier to find, ...
Old Kent Road Opportunity Area
Old Kent Road development – update
Urban Design London has issued another video on what is happening in the Old Kent Road Opportunity Area. An update on 13th ...
mansion tax
High Value Council Tax Surcharge
There is a consultation ending on 14th July 2026 on a proposed High Value Council Tax Surcharge (HVCTS) on owners of homes for each ...
  • TBM 'Florence' [Photo: HS2 ltd]

HS2 Reset

10th June 2026|

The High Speed 2 railway has had numerous resets yet it clings on to its existence albeit in a truncated form. The latest announcement by the Secretary of State for Transport followed [more…]

  • How Effective is Planning Enforcement?

    📆 Mon 29th June | 18:30 - 20:30
    🚩 77 Cowcross Street, EC1M 6EL (map)
    How can we make it work better? Planning enforcement is important. Unless it’s done effectively, the integrity of the whole planning system is put at risk. But it’s one of the most frustrating issues for civic societies and local community groups. We’ll discuss this and related issues at this Open Meeting on 29th June. Please book here ( https://www.londonforum.org.uk/events/how-effective-is-planning-enforcement#booking ) Cases typically include: Large developments that grossly fail to meet planning conditions or even submitted drawings and plans; Illegal demolitions; Unauthorised residential alterations and extensions; Additional floors…

Featured Pages