Response to Accelerated Planning consultation

Published On: 5th May 2024

There were 36 questions to respond to covering a range of proposals. In summary, we acknowledged that IF implemented sensibly, on a modest scale and for applications with few complications, it could work BUT otherwise it would likely make things worse in the processing of all planning applications – causing a diversion of resources in Local Authorities when many are having problems establishing a full complement of planning staff. We made the point that most large schemes will have been many months, and most likely years in the making. So, reducing the limit from the current 13 weeks to 10 weeks for the determination of eligible applications is almost irrelevant. We emphasised that meaningful pre-application engagement with the local community should be strongly encouraged and that in our experience the main cause of delay is that almost all planning applications for major developments run materially counter to adopted local plan policies in one or more respects.

 

Categories: Updates
Share This Article

All Tags

E-bike fire Shepherds Bush [photo: LFB]
A lithium-ion battery fire every five hours
Fire brigades are responding to a lithium-ion battery fire every five hours, according to research from QBE, indicating 1,760 incidents in 2025—up ...
Macfarlane Place W12 (Peabody)
More social housing
The King's Speech included proposed legislation to increase investment in social housing. The Social Housing Bill was introduced into the House of ...
Planning fees
Planning Fees consultation response
We've responded to the government's consultation on planning application fees. While the proposal to set a National Default Fee Schedule at 90% ...
  • London Forum open meeting - Enforcement

    📅 Mon 29th June | 18:30 - 20:30
    🚩 77 Cowcross Street, EC1M 6EL (map)
    Speakers and agenda to be confirmed
    Please save the date !

Featured Pages